Taylor Rule Calculator - Federal Funds Rate Estimate

Use this taylor rule calculator to estimate the recommended federal funds rate from the inflation gap, output gap, and equilibrium real rate.

Updated: June 12, 2026 • Free Tool

Taylor Rule Calculator

Year-over-year inflation rate (CPI, PCE, or GDP deflator).

The central bank's long-run inflation target. The US Federal Reserve targets 2%.

Percentage gap between actual real GDP and potential real GDP. Positive means above potential.

Long-run equilibrium real federal funds rate. US estimates typically range from 0.5% to 2%.

Response coefficient on the inflation gap. Taylor (1993) uses 0.5; the balanced approach uses 1.0.

Response coefficient on the output gap. Taylor (1993) and the balanced approach both use 0.5.

Results

Recommended federal funds rate
0%%
Inflation gap 0pp
Real rate component 0%

What Is Taylor Rule Calculator?

A taylor rule calculator is a monetary policy tool that estimates the federal funds rate that a simple interest-rate rule would prescribe. It is based on the 1993 policy rule proposed by John B. Taylor, which responds to both the inflation gap and the output gap. Use the taylor rule calculator to test how a textbook policy rule would set interest rates under different macroeconomic conditions, compare the rule's prescription with actual policy decisions, explore the impact of changing the equilibrium real rate or the response weights, and frame classroom or briefing discussions about how central banks balance inflation and output stability.

  • Central bank policy benchmarking: Compare a central bank's actual policy rate with what the Taylor Rule recommends, and discuss the gap.
  • Macroeconomic classroom exercises: Let students see how a policy rule responds to changes in inflation and the output gap.
  • Scenario analysis: Test how the recommended rate would shift under different inflation or output scenarios.
  • Research and forecasting: Use the rule as a starting point for forecasting rate paths or evaluating policy stances.

The Taylor Rule is a simple benchmark, not a description of how any central bank actually sets rates. Differences should be interpreted in the context of the central bank's reaction function, communication, and economic conditions at the time.

Because the rule uses several estimated inputs, the recommended rate is only as good as the assumptions behind it. The equilibrium real rate, the inflation target, and the output gap are all unobservable in real time.

How Taylor Rule Calculator Works

i = r* + π + a(π - π*) + b(y - y*)
  • Current inflation (π): The actual year-over-year inflation rate for the period, often measured by CPI, PCE, or GDP deflator.
  • Inflation target (π*): The central bank's long-run inflation objective. The US Federal Reserve targets 2% on the PCE price index.
  • Output gap (y - y*): The percentage gap between actual real GDP and potential real GDP. Positive means the economy is above potential.
  • Equilibrium real rate (r*): The long-run real interest rate consistent with output at potential. US estimates are typically between 0.5% and 2%.
  • Inflation gap weight (a): The response coefficient on the inflation gap. Taylor (1993) uses 0.5; the balanced approach uses 1.0.
  • Output gap weight (b): The response coefficient on the output gap. Taylor (1993) and the balanced approach both use 0.5.

The Taylor Rule weights decide how aggressively the rule responds. The original 1993 rule uses 0.5 for both gaps, while the balanced approach uses 1.0 for the inflation gap and 0.5 for the output gap.

The output gap is the most sensitive input because it is estimated rather than observed. CBO, IMF, and OECD estimates can differ by several percentage points, so the same rule can yield different recommended rates depending on which estimate is used.

Taylor's original 1993 example

Current inflation = 2.5%, inflation target = 2%, output gap = +1%, r* = 2%, weights 0.5 and 0.5.

Inflation gap = 2.5 - 2 = 0.5. Recommended rate = 2 + 2.5 + 0.5 x 0.5 + 0.5 x 1 = 2 + 2.5 + 0.25 + 0.5 = 5.25%.

Recommended federal funds rate of 5.25%

A small positive output gap combined with inflation slightly above target leads the rule to recommend a federal funds rate well above the inflation rate, consistent with moderately restrictive policy.

According to Federal Reserve History, the Taylor Rule proposed in 1993 by John B. Taylor prescribes a federal funds rate that responds to deviations of inflation from target and to the output gap. In the displayed formula, r* and current inflation enter one-for-one, while Taylor's original response coefficients put 0.5 on the inflation gap and 0.5 on the output gap.

For a complementary rule that estimates the output gap from the unemployment gap, see the Okun Law Calculator.

Key Concepts Explained

These concepts keep the Taylor Rule result readable and prevent common misinterpretations when comparing the rule to actual policy.

Equilibrium real interest rate (r-star)

The equilibrium real federal funds rate is the real interest rate expected to prevail when output is at potential and inflation is at target. US estimates typically range from 0.5% to 2%. A one percentage point change in r-star moves the recommended rate by one percentage point.

Inflation target

The inflation target is the central bank's stated objective. The Federal Reserve targets 2% PCE inflation, while the ECB targets 2% over the medium term. Holding observed inflation fixed, a higher target lowers the inflation-gap term.

Inflation gap

The inflation gap is current inflation minus the inflation target. A positive gap means the economy is running hotter than the target and the rule recommends a higher rate. The original Taylor Rule weights this gap at 0.5; the balanced approach uses 1.0.

Output gap

The output gap is actual real GDP minus potential real GDP, expressed as a percentage of potential. A positive gap means the economy is operating above sustainable capacity. Taylor's 1993 rule weights this gap at 0.5.

When the inflation gap and output gap are both zero, the rule's nominal-rate prescription equals r* plus the inflation rate. That result is the nominal counterpart of a neutral real stance; above it is restrictive policy, and below it is accommodative.

The output gap and the inflation gap also feed the expectations-augmented Phillips Curve, which describes how inflation responds to slack. The Taylor Rule and the Phillips Curve share the same gap concept but answer different questions: one prescribes the policy rate, the other predicts inflation.

To see how the same gap measures feed an inflation-outlook model, the Phillips Curve Calculator walks through the expectations-augmented version in detail.

How to Use This Calculator

Use the inputs below to translate your macroeconomic assumptions into a single recommended federal funds rate under the chosen Taylor Rule coefficient settings.

  1. 1 Enter current inflation: Use the most recent year-over-year inflation reading (CPI, PCE, or GDP deflator).
  2. 2 Enter the inflation target: Use 2% for the US Federal Reserve or the announced target of the central bank you are modeling.
  3. 3 Add the output gap: Use a CBO, IMF, or OECD estimate of the percentage gap between actual and potential real GDP.
  4. 4 Set the equilibrium real rate: A common US starting point is 1% to 2%, but use a research-based estimate for the country and period.
  5. 5 Choose the Taylor Rule coefficients: Use 0.5 for both gaps to reproduce the 1993 Taylor Rule, or 1.0 for the inflation gap for the balanced approach.
  6. 6 Read the recommended rate: Compare the result with the actual policy rate to assess the policy stance.

Suppose current inflation is 2.5%, the inflation target is 2%, the output gap is +1%, and r* is 2%. With the 1993 weights of 0.5, the calculator returns a recommended federal funds rate of 5.25% and a real rate component of 2.75%, indicating a moderately restrictive policy stance.

If you have actual and potential GDP levels rather than a ready percentage gap, the GDP Gap Calculator can prepare the output gap input.

Benefits of Using This Calculator

A taylor rule calculator helps you test how a simple policy rule responds to macroeconomic data and compare the rule's prescription with actual monetary policy decisions.

  • Transparent assumptions: Every input is visible, so the recommended rate can be traced back to the inflation gap, output gap, and r-star assumption.
  • Fast policy benchmarking: Compare the rule's recommended rate with the actual federal funds rate to see whether policy is loose, neutral, or tight.
  • Sensitivity testing: Change the inflation gap weight to 1.0 to switch to the balanced approach.
  • Classroom utility: Students can connect the formula, variables, and worked example before applying the same method to new data.
  • Scenario comparison: Run a recession scenario and an overheating scenario back to back to see how the rule would have moved the policy rate.

The biggest practical benefit is disciplined comparison. The value comes from comparing the rule's number with the actual policy rate, with other rules, or across time periods. The rule is a benchmark, not a forecast.

Use the result as a starting point for discussion, not as a prediction. The rule does not capture forward guidance, asset purchase programs, or other unconventional tools used since 2008.

To see how the recommended nominal rate separates into an inflation component and a real component, pair this rule with the Fisher Equation Calculator.

Factors That Affect Your Results

Several assumptions and economic conditions affect the Taylor Rule result, so treat the recommended rate as an estimate that depends on your inputs.

Output gap estimate

Potential output is not directly observed, so CBO, IMF, and OECD estimates can differ by several percentage points. A 2 percentage point change in the output gap moves the 1993 rule's recommended rate by 1 percentage point.

Equilibrium real rate (r-star)

r-star is estimated and has drifted lower in many advanced economies. A 1 percentage point change in r-star moves the recommended rate one-for-one.

Inflation target

Holding observed inflation fixed, a higher target makes the gap smaller and lowers the recommended rate through the gap term. If inflation rises with the target, the one-for-one inflation term can offset part or all of that effect.

Coefficient choice

The 1993 rule uses 0.5 for both gaps. The balanced approach uses 1.0 for the inflation gap, which produces a more aggressive response to inflation deviations.

  • The Taylor Rule can recommend negative nominal rates in deep recessions, but most central banks cannot push the nominal policy rate far below zero. The rule is silent on quantitative easing and forward guidance.
  • The rule uses fixed weights that do not adjust for the state of the economy. In practice, central banks often respond more aggressively to inflation once expectations risk becoming unanchored.

The rule is mechanical and does not capture the judgment central banks exercise in real time. Treat the rule as one input rather than a binding prescription.

Run a base case, a higher-inflation case, and a recession case. If all three tell the same directional story, the result is more useful; if they diverge, the rule deserves more attention than the headline number.

According to Congressional Budget Office, potential GDP is the value of output the economy would produce if labor and capital were employed at their sustainable rates, and the CBO publishes regular estimates that are commonly used to construct the output gap input for the Taylor Rule.

The Federal Reserve Board's policy-rules guide presents the Taylor Rule as a formula for the nominal federal funds rate using r*, current inflation, a 0.5 inflation-gap response, and a 0.5 output-gap response.

For the actual real interest rate implied by an observed nominal rate, the Real Interest Rate Calculator converts the policy rate into real terms.

taylor rule calculator showing current inflation, target inflation, output gap, equilibrium real rate, and recommended federal funds rate result
taylor rule calculator showing current inflation, target inflation, output gap, equilibrium real rate, and recommended federal funds rate result

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: What is the Taylor Rule formula?

A: The Taylor Rule formula is i = r* + π + a(π - π*) + b(y - y*), where i is the recommended nominal federal funds rate, r* is the equilibrium real interest rate, π is current inflation, π* is the inflation target, a and b are response coefficients, and (y - y*) is the output gap. The original 1993 rule uses a = b = 0.5.

Q: How does the Taylor Rule set the federal funds rate?

A: The rule combines the equilibrium real interest rate, current inflation, the inflation gap, and the output gap into a single recommended rate. When inflation is above target or the output gap is positive, the rule recommends a higher rate. When inflation is below target or the output gap is negative, it recommends a lower rate.

Q: What are the typical Taylor Rule coefficients?

A: Taylor's original 1993 paper uses 0.5 for the inflation gap and 0.5 for the output gap. The 'balanced approach' rule he proposed in 1999 uses 1.0 for the inflation gap and 0.5 for the output gap, which makes the rule respond more strongly to inflation deviations from target.

Q: What is the equilibrium real interest rate in the Taylor Rule?

A: The equilibrium real interest rate (r-star) is the long-run real interest rate consistent with output at potential and stable inflation. For the United States, recent estimates typically fall between 0.5% and 2% and have drifted lower over time. The Taylor Rule result is very sensitive to this assumption.

Q: How does the Taylor Rule differ from actual Fed policy?

A: The rule is a mechanical benchmark, while actual policy incorporates judgment, forward guidance, and unconventional tools. Comparing the rule's recommended rate with the actual federal funds rate can highlight periods when policy was looser or tighter than the rule would suggest, but the gap is not by itself a sign of policy error.

Q: What are the limitations of the Taylor Rule?

A: The rule can recommend negative nominal rates in deep recessions, but central banks have generally not been able to push the policy rate far below zero. The rule also uses fixed weights that do not adjust for the state of the economy, and it does not capture quantitative easing or forward guidance.